The report below provides performance feedback for your coaches and players
Click on the the stats to watch the clips
If you want to know how to do this for your team email me using the contact form at the bottom of this page
Click on the the stats to watch the clips
If you want to know how to do this for your team email me using the contact form at the bottom of this page
Old Elthamians
22
3 tries
final
Esher
10
1 try
Quick Overview
Key match statistics at a glance — Home and Opposition side by side.
Match Variables
| Old Elthamians | Metric | Esher |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Tries | 1 |
| 67 | Ball Carries | 118 |
| 2 | Linebreaks | 5 |
| 16 | Kick In Plays | 16 |
| 7 | Kick To Touch | 3 |
| 9 | Handling Errors | 16 |
| 35 | Turnovers Won | 36 |
| 86 | Tackles Made | 53 |
| 34 | Double Tackles Made | 15 |
| 17 | Tackles Missed | 25 |
| 88% | Tackle Completion Rate % | 73% |
| 68 | Rucks | 120 |
| 5 | Mauls | 7 |
| 7 | Penalties Conceded | 11 |
| 0 | Total Cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow Cards | 0 |
| 0 | Red Cards | 0 |
| 42% | Possession % | 58% |
Goal-Kicking & Kick Outcomes
Set Piece
Ball in Play & Territory Zones
Ball-in-play time spent in each pitch zone. Middle zone is the remainder after both attacking 22m timers.
Total Ball In Play Time
38:19
Esher 22m
25%
9:39
Middle Zone
63%
24:06
Old Elthamians 22m
12%
4:33
Performance Insights
- Old Elthamians scored 2 more tries than the opposition.
- Esher recorded a turnover differential of -1.
- Old Elthamians made 7 fewer handling errors.
- Discipline was an area of concern for Esher, with 4 more penalties conceded.
- Old Elthamians achieved a tackle-completion advantage of 15 percentage points.
Attacking Efficiency
How efficiently each side turned carries into tries and linebreaks.
Old Elthamians
Carries per try22.3
Tries per 10 carries0.4
Linebreaks per 10 carries0.3
Handling errors per 10 carries1.3
Turnovers won per 10 opp. carries3
Esher
Carries per try118
Tries per 10 carries0.1
Linebreaks per 10 carries0.4
Handling errors per 10 carries1.4
Turnovers won per 10 opp. carries5.4
Tactical Kicking Profile
Share of recorded kicks that stayed in play versus went to touch.
Old Elthamians
In play share
70%
Touch share
30%
Kick volume (in play + touch)
23
Esher
In play share
84%
Touch share
16%
Kick volume (in play + touch)
19
Defensive Efficiency
Solo and double tackle contribution, completion, workload and missed-tackle impact.
Old Elthamians
Total tackles completed
120
Solo 86 (71.7%)
Double 34 (28.3%)
Tackle efficiency
88%
Tackles missed
17
Missed tackle impact
12.4%
Missed per 10 opp. carries
1.4
Defensive workload (completed / 10 carries)
10.2
Esher
Total tackles completed
68
Solo 53 (77.9%)
Double 15 (22.1%)
Tackle efficiency
73%
Tackles missed
25
Missed tackle impact
26.9%
Missed per 10 opp. carries
3.7
Defensive workload (completed / 10 carries)
10.1
Ball in Play & Territory
Match-level ball-in-play time in each pitch zone. Zone timers are not split by possession.
Esher 22m
25% · 9:39
25% · 9:39
Middle Zone
63% · 24:06
63% · 24:06
Old Elthamians 22m
12% · 4:33
12% · 4:33
22m Zone Activity
Contributions that occured while the ball was in each attacking 22.
Old Elthamians Attacking 22m — effect totals
Old Elthamians positive
14
Old Elthamians negative
3
Esher positive
15
Esher negative
5
Esher Attacking 22m — effect totals
Old Elthamians positive
59
Old Elthamians negative
8
Esher positive
14
Esher negative
8
Positive — try, linebreak, turnover won, tackle made, set piece won
Negative — missed tackle, penalty conceded, handling error, set piece lost
Volume — ball carries, rucks
| Event | Effect on play | Old Elthamians | Esher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball Carries | Volume | 11 | 9 |
| Rucks | Volume | 12 | 9 |
| Tries | Positive | 2 | 0 |
| Linebreaks | Positive | 0 | 0 |
| Turnovers Won | Positive | 3 | 3 |
| Tackles Made (solo) | Positive | 6 | 9 |
| Double Tackles Made | Positive | 3 | 3 |
| Tackles Missed | Negative | 1 | 4 |
| Penalties Conceded | Negative | 0 | 0 |
| Handling Errors | Negative | 2 | 1 |
| Lineouts Won | Positive | 0 | 0 |
| Lineouts Lost | Negative | 0 | 0 |
| Scrums Won | Positive | 0 | 0 |
| Scrums Lost | Negative | 0 | 0 |
| Positive effect (combined) | Positive | 14 | 15 |
| Negative effect (combined) | Negative | 3 | 5 |
| Event | Effect on play | Old Elthamians | Esher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball Carries | Volume | 7 | 50 |
| Rucks | Volume | 5 | 51 |
| Tries | Positive | 0 | 1 |
| Linebreaks | Positive | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers Won | Positive | 8 | 6 |
| Tackles Made (solo) | Positive | 34 | 5 |
| Double Tackles Made | Positive | 17 | 0 |
| Tackles Missed | Negative | 5 | 2 |
| Penalties Conceded | Negative | 1 | 3 |
| Handling Errors | Negative | 2 | 3 |
| Lineouts Won | Positive | 0 | 0 |
| Lineouts Lost | Negative | 0 | 0 |
| Scrums Won | Positive | 0 | 0 |
| Scrums Lost | Negative | 0 | 0 |
| Positive effect (combined) | Positive | 59 | 14 |
| Negative effect (combined) | Negative | 8 | 8 |